In Zero Gravity

Watch the session

The setup

Every few years a category shows up with no conventions attached to it. No benchmarks. No rate card. No agreed definition of what good work looks like, and no case studies to point a nervous client toward. Social had that window. Influencer had it. Retail media had it. In each case the same thing happened: independents watched from the edge until the category grew a playbook, and by the time the playbook existed, someone else had set the pricing and owned the relationships.

Commercial spaceflight is in that window now. Tickets are being sold to stations that have not launched. A performing arts company is training on parabolic flights — aircraft that fly repeated arcs, each arc buying 20 to 30 seconds of weightlessness — so it can stage work in orbit. Brands are circling, and most of what they have done so far is send a product up and film it.

This session was the clearest look all week at what it feels like to sell into a category that has no shape yet. Two people who are doing it described the entry price, the partner structures they invented because none existed, and the part they cannot answer.

For an agency principal who will never touch a space brand, that is the whole value. The category is a case study. The problem is one you will meet again.

Who was on stage, and why they're worth listening to

Part One — Selling a category before you sell the work

Florencia's first job in any conversation is not persuasion. It is orientation. She said so plainly when Kyle asked how she protects the integrity of the ecosystem while inviting partners into it.

That gap between broad interest and zero literacy is the shape of every pre-convention category. Demand exists. Vocabulary does not. Her illustration was a conversation with another agency that had already worked in the sector without recognizing it as a sector.

One-offs, in other words. A stunt, filed and forgotten, with no second act designed into it. That is what a category looks like before it has conventions: activity without accumulation.

Ugo's contribution is the reason the category is about to acquire conventions whether the creative industry participates or not. The International Space Station is being retired and replaced by commercial stations, and he named them: Vast, Axiom, Starlab, among others. Government agencies are shifting their attention outward. What is left behind in low Earth orbit is commercial capacity, and commercial capacity needs customers.

He put a number on how many.

74 is the sort of figure that sounds like inventory because it is. It is a list of categories somebody has already segmented, which means someone is already building a sales process against it. Marketing and media appear on that list. They are not the reason the stations are being built, and they are on the list anyway.

Ugo's second point is the one that determines whether any of this arrives on schedule, and it is a cost argument rather than a technology argument. He credits Falcon 9 with cutting the price of reaching orbit by a factor of 10, and expects Starship to cut it by another 10. His arithmetic across the two: a hundredfold reduction inside 20 years.

That curve is why he refuses to let the room treat orbit as distant.

He made the comparison sharper for the audience in front of him: from Cannes, most of the United States is farther away than the space station is. The distance problem is a familiarity problem wearing a costume.

Part Two — Pricing access to something scarce

Kyle asked the question most moderators skip, and asked it twice.

Florencia answered without hedging.

Read that structure carefully, because it is transferable to any scarce-access proposition an independent agency might own: a proprietary event, a research panel, a first-look relationship, a physical space. She has three currencies, not one. Cash. Cultural credibility. And in-kind resource, which in her case includes the company that operates the flights sponsoring the flights themselves.

The named cultural partners she cited include a microgravity research center carrying Stephen Hawking's name, a Miami art-house cinema, and an academic space initiative. Those partners are not paying six figures. They are supplying legitimacy, which in a category with no conventions is the scarcer commodity.

The commercial partnerships split into two types in her telling. One is functional: equipment that has never been tested in the absence of gravity, and companies that want to know how it behaves.

The other type is where she draws her line, and the line is a refusal of the easiest money in the category.

"Those take more time. That's the truth." That admission is the most agency-relevant sentence in the session. She is telling a room of people who sell on timelines that her model is slower than the alternative and that she will not pretend otherwise. Every independent with a premium proposition has to make that trade in front of a client at some point, and most of them soften it. She did not.

She also opened the door wider than the category usually allows.

In a mature category that would be poaching risk. In a pre-convention category it is how the convention gets built, because nobody has enough demand yet to be territorial about it.

There is a concrete number attached to all of this. Florencia said Paraboles is chartering parabolic flights, with a flight in November, and that seats start around $100,000, training included. That is the current entry point to the physical experience, and it is roughly the same order of magnitude as the partnership floor. Ugo's ladder above it runs: parabolic flight, then suborbital flights from Blue Origin or Virgin Galactic offering about four minutes of weightlessness, then commercial space stations. He put the first station operational in 2027, with private activity opening around 2029 or 2030.

Ugo was the only person in the room willing to describe what the top of that ladder does to a body, and he did it while arguing for the training his own company sells.

The commercial point underneath that transfers to any category nobody has mapped yet. What a client is buying is the story afterward, and the thing standing between the money and the story is a preparation cost nobody has put in the budget.

Which means a brand committing today is buying a three-to-five-year option, not a campaign.

The uncomfortable truth

Two people in that room pushed on the same nerve, and neither got a satisfying answer.

Kyle asked what question an agency or brand leader should take back to their innovation pipeline to know whether they are building a permanent, repeatable platform or buying a fleeting moment, and framed it around the risk of looking gimmicky. An audience member came at it from the other side, asking whether commercialization would push the category toward trend-jacking rather than creativity.

Florencia's answer to both was brand fit.

That is a sound answer and it is not a measurement. Archetype alignment tells you whether a client should be interested. It does not tell you what the six figures returns, because there is no benchmark to return against. In a category with 74 identified industries and one launched station, nobody can hand you a comparable.

The most honest version of the ROI argument came from Ugo, and it is structural rather than financial. Under the old arrangement, a project got one flight, maybe two, at enormous cost, which made return on investment close to impossible to demonstrate even for science. Commercial stations change the frequency. A project can fly repeatedly. Repetition is what makes measurement possible at all.

So the uncomfortable truth for an agency reading this is not that space is speculative. It is the sequence. Repeatability is the thing that would justify the spend, and repeatability arrives in 2029 or 2030, while the invoice arrives now. Any principal recommending this to a client is recommending they buy in during the window where the price is lowest and the proof is absent, and those are the same window by definition. That is the actual trade in every emerging category, stated more plainly here than it usually is because the timelines are measured in years and printed on rockets.

The second uncomfortable item is quieter. Florencia's partner list includes the operator of the flights as a sponsor of the flights. That is standard practice for a category being built rather than served, and it is worth naming: in a pre-convention market, your supply chain and your sponsor base are frequently the same people, and the independence of your proposition is something you have to actively maintain rather than assume.

What you can use